www.omnipotents.com/forums

ONS-Dark-Marsh-p00tylicious-V4
- All player starts inside the core area or ON the wall. No more starts OUTSIDE the wall
- Updated EONS Scorps to OmniLInkScorps, some tweaks to scorpion layouts.
- Updated to use Omni Skyminer instead of embedded Aurora

Yes seemed to be server wide. I didn't see any CPU spikes in the NFO logs, but they are very detailed/granular.
Felt more like a Network issue but no network events were logged by NFO (they will log DDOS attacks and the like)

Sub-Zero [535] 0.976

I feel like this is wrong, sorry to pick you SZ, but given his top 5 aim, reducing his PPH seems to go the wrong direction... because of that aim, he usually has MORE impact than his PPH would indicate...

Update: If you are a NEW player please read: - Please practice a bit offline and learn the game. Know what is Linking a node and how to Link with LinkGun. Practice vehicles. Practice moving. We don't care how bad you are at playing, but if you're just walking around semi-aimlessly, don't ever link a...

I think 2.2 for spread is wrong though. Maybe, that's why I made the spreadsheet, so we could change it and see. 2.0 felt like there wasn't enough spread to guarantee that you don't end up with a bunch of power players on one team. And the other aspect is some of the players with really good aim (e...

Probably better to just ask them in a support ticket. I'd hate to mess with it and have it mess up some of their automation and leave it in an unusable state. I opened a ticket and asked. CPU is bit higher over the last few months, probably due to tick rate increase.... maybe we need to reduce it a ...

And there's players with higher win % that are definitely not better players than Leon.

Are you saying its not how big but how you use it?

So I made this: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... =671937450

Got the raw ranking data.

I put the formula in... sorted by adjusted PPH. Used 2.2 for spread.

And you just don't ever want Hector on your team.

If you want a bigger spread, make 2.0 larger, but otherwise the formula is correct imo.

Yeah just the spread, not the formula...

The multipliers are wrong. We have enough win % in the database that all multipliers should be based on that. Here is what they should be. Win % * 2.0/100 Agree with the first part, not sure on the formula. I'd also adjust the stats so that games with <6 players are excluded (Ankeedo). I don't thin...